Author: admin

  • Year-on-Year Growth — GST Collection Reaches Rs 1.59 Lakh Crore, Up by 11%

    GST revenue reached Rs 1.59 lakh crore in August, marking an 11% increase compared to the same period last year. This growth can be attributed to enhanced compliance and a decrease in tax evasion, as stated by Revenue Secretary Sanjay Malhotra. In August 2022, the GST collection amounted to Rs 1,43,612 crore.

    Breaking down the August figures, CGST contributed Rs 28,328 crore, SGST accounted for Rs 35,794 crore, IGST reached Rs 83,251 crore (including Rs 43,550 crore from imports), and cess added up to Rs 11,695 crore (including Rs 1,016 crore from imports).

    The Finance Ministry affirmed, “The revenues for August 2023 have surged by 11% compared to the same month last year. Import revenue experienced a 3% boost, and domestic transactions, including import of services, recorded a remarkable 14% increase compared to the corresponding period last year.”

    However, it’s worth noting that while GST collections demonstrated year-on-year growth, there was a decline when compared to the collections in June and July.

    In July 2023, the combined GST revenue for the central and state governments amounted to Rs 1.65 lakh crore, reflecting an 11% increase from the previous year. In June 2023, the total GST collection stood at Rs 1.61 lakh crore.

    It’s essential to emphasize that the government has set an ambitious target of collecting over Rs 9.50 lakh crore through GST in the current financial year, ending in March 2024.

  • Two Arrested as Commercial Tax Department Uncovers GST Bill Scam

    The Commercial Taxes Department, Government of Karnataka, has taken a decisive stand against a network of counterfeit GST bill operators in the southern zone of Bengaluru. This illicit syndicate facilitated companies within the service sector, particularly those dealing with manpower and labor supplies, to illicitly claim fake Input Tax Credit (ITC) and artificially boost their reported turnover.

    In an official announcement, it is highlighted that this marks a groundbreaking operation, as it is the first instance of exposing a false invoicing scheme within the service industry.

    Investigations by the Enforcement Wing brought to light that nearly 30 fictitious entities were established, utilizing the identities of family members, acquaintances, and associates. While scrutinizing the transactions, it was revealed that a staggering ₹525 crore was involved in this fraudulent activity. The enforcement team estimates a substantial revenue loss of approximately ₹90 crore suffered by the government due to this deception.

    The Enforcement Wing swiftly took action and apprehended two individuals believed to be the masterminds behind this operation – Guru Prakash H.M. and Manjunathiah H.M. The operation is anticipated to lead to more arrests, as stated in the official release.

    The Department of Commercial Taxes of Karnataka is adopting a robust approach in tackling the menace of fabricated invoicing and tax evasion. It is underscored that participation in such deceitful practices can result in severe consequences, including arrest, legal prosecution, and imprisonment. Additionally, fines, penalties, confiscation of assets, and the provisional seizure of properties and bank accounts may be imposed, reinforcing the government’s determination to root out such illicit activities.

  • Official Confirmation — Indian Parliament Passes Legislative Amendments for 28% GST Tax

    In August 2023, the Indian Parliament greenlit a fresh law mandating a 28% Goods and Services Tax (GST) on the total value of player deposits across online casinos, racecourses, and similar gaming platforms. This novel regulation is slated to become effective from October 1st, 2023.

    A mere month following the legislation’s approval, India’s Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, publicly announced these changes during the 50th Council meeting. Her declaration clarified that this imposition of a 28% GST on gambling wasn’t intended to harm the industry, but rather emerged as a sensible response. It was perceived as ethically problematic to tax gambling at the same rate as essential commodities.

    Regarding online gaming, the 28% GST shall apply whenever there’s a form of wagering involved. This encompasses scenarios like operators presenting no deposit casino bonuses, where there’s potential for monetary gains.

    Impact of the 28% GST Tax on Online Gaming

    Following the official implementation of the GST rules from October 1st, players engaging in games that entail wagering will be required to pay an additional ₹28 for every ₹100 spent on the game. This levy will be imposed on all online games featuring betting, regardless of whether they’re skill-based or chance-driven.

    The online gaming sector has voiced its agreement that this new tax law will curtail their capacity to invest in fresh games, affecting cash flow and business expansion across the board. Even the Fantasy Gaming industry, on track to surpass ₹25,000 Crore in revenue by 2027, is bracing for significant setbacks.

    Robert Landers, CEO of The All India Gaming Federation (AIGF), which presently represents companies like Nazara, GamrsKraft, Zupee, and WinZO, criticized this announcement as unjust, irrational, and unconstitutional. He highlighted that this decision sidesteps a 60-year-old law by conflating online skill gaming with gambling activities. Concerned about the adverse effects on the industry and its employment figures, Landers also remarked that the beneficiaries of this tax will be unscrupulous offshore platforms.

    According to the official legislation, this tax will apply whenever wagering is involved but not to casual game hosting providers. Nonetheless, it’s crucial to bear in mind that presently, online gambling and betting games will face a 28% tax, while other games will be subject to a standard 18% tax on their gross gaming revenue.

    GST vs. Foreign Direct Investment

    Joy Battacharjya, Director General of the Federation of India Fantasy Sports (FIFS), emphasized that this decision would negatively impact the current $2.5 billion foreign direct investment and potentially impede future ventures. Additionally, this move might push players towards illicit gambling options, increasing the government’s exposure to risk and potential loss. Battacharjya stressed the necessity of distinguishing between skill-based games and gambling games in online casinos.

    India’s E-Gaming Federation (EGF) warned that an added tax might lead to taxes outweighing revenues, stifling the gambling industry while bolstering underground operators at the expense of taxpayers.

    Ashneer Grover, co-founder of BharatPe, a company that recently launched its own fantasy gaming platform, strongly criticized the government’s announcement, labeling it as a ‘death knell for the fantasy gaming industry.’

    The GST Council’s Response

    Discussion about the uptick in tax rates concerning horse racing, casinos, and online gaming had been introduced by Sitharaman earlier in July, following extensive dialogues with the Council. During a recent press briefing, she noted that the Council was open to conducting a performance review within six months of October 1st. This implies that all entities will have ample time to adjust their operations in alignment with the new GST laws, irrespective of their stance on taxation.

  • Simplified Approach to Biometric Aadhaar Authentication for GST Registration

    The GSTN released an Advisory on August 28, 2023, concerning applicants who have chosen Biometric-based Aadhaar Authentication for their GST Registration application.

    A change has been introduced to Rule 8 of CGST Rules. This change specifies that applicants who have indicated their preference for Aadhaar number authentication and have been identified through data analysis and risk assessment on the common portal will now undergo biometric-based Aadhaar authentication. Additionally, photographs of the applicants will be taken as part of this process.

    The implementation of this change has reached its pilot phase, and the necessary functionality is prepared for launch on the GSTN portal. This new feature will first be introduced in Puducherry, starting from August 30, 2023. Here’s how the process will work: Once an application in Form GST REG-01 is submitted, but before the Application Reference Number (ARN) is generated, the applicant will receive either a message to visit a GST Suvidha Kendra (GSK) or a link on their declared Mobile and Email ID, as applicable at the Temporary Reference Number (TRN) stage. This step depends on the identification made by the common portal, facilitating a streamlined registration process.

    For applicants who receive a link on their Mobile & Email ID for Aadhaar Authentication, they can proceed as per the current implementation to complete their application.

    On the other hand, applicants who receive a message to visit GSK will need to go to the designated GSK location as communicated through Mobile/Email. Here, they will undergo biometric authentication for all necessary individuals according to the GST Application Form REG-01. It’s important to note that these applicants should visit the GSK before the TRN expiry date, as specified in the Email outlining the Biometric-based Aadhaar Authentication process. In such cases, the Application Reference Number (ARN) will only be generated after the successful completion of the Biometric-based Aadhaar Authentication process.

    The operational days of the GSK will be determined by the state administration’s guidance.

    You can find the complete details in the Advisory available at this link: Advisory Link.

  • Notice Issued by Supreme Court on Pleas Challenging Arrest and Summoning Powers of GST Officials

    On August 25, the Supreme Court took a significant step by issuing notice in two closely related writ petitions that were presented under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution. These petitions challenge the legality of certain aspects within the Central Goods and Services Tax Act of 2017 (CGST Act), most notably Section 69 (the power to make arrests) and Section 70(1) (the authority to summon individuals for testimony and document presentation). Remarkably, the Court has also taken the proactive measure of halting any forceful actions against the individuals who lodged these petitions. The judicial panel presiding over these matters consisted of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia.

    In the heart of these petitions lies the assertion that Sections 69 and 70 of the CGST Act hold an unconstitutional character due to their criminal nature. According to the petitioners, these provisions couldn’t have been established under the framework of Article 246A of the 1950 Indian Constitution. This argument stems from the idea that the power to detain and prosecute should not be viewed as secondary to the authority to impose and gather taxes on goods and services.

    The petitioners clarified this viewpoint by referencing Entry 93 of List 1 within the Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution. This entry, they emphasize, grants jurisdiction to the Parliament to create criminal laws exclusively for matters outlined in List 1, not for matters related to CGST. Consequently, Sections 69 and 70 of the CGST Act are deemed to fall outside the legislative competence of the Parliament.

    Furthermore, it was argued that despite endowing CGST officers with police officer and civil court powers during investigations, the proceedings are labeled as ‘inquiries’, and those summoned are not categorized as ‘accused’ individuals. This categorization, the petitioners believe, is inconsistent, as these officers do not possess the status of actual police officers and consequently, those summoned lack the protections afforded by Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution. This discrepancy, the petitioners contend, places them at a distinct disadvantage.

    The petitions also highlight ongoing legal matters before the Apex Court that concern the obligatory adherence to the procedures outlined in the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1973 (CrPC) when investigating offenses under the CGST Act of 2017.

    In the context of these specific petitions, the situation involves the initiation of an investigation by the office of Respondent No. 2 pertaining to allegations of GST evasion or non-payment.

    Given these circumstances, the petitioners initiated these legal actions, fearing potential coercive measures by the respondents. Their primary objective is to have the ongoing proceedings against them under the CGST Act, in connection to an alleged non-cognizable offense, quashed. They maintain that the current proceedings lack adherence to established legal procedures, as specified in Chapter-XII of the CrPC, particularly Sections 154 to 157 and Section 172.

    Case Title: Gagandeep Singh v. Union of India, W.P. (Crl) No. 339/2023, Gagan Kakkar v. Union of India, W.P. (Crl) No. 357/2023

  • Petroleum Dealers Rally for Uniform Tax Structure Under GST

    Petroleum dealers are assertively advocating for a shift to a unified tax system like the Goods and Service Tax (GST) across India. This call gains momentum in the wake of a recent peaceful protest held in Delhi by a faction of dealers from specific Northern states. The essence of their demand is to establish a consistent tax structure that spans across state boundaries. This initiative aims to eliminate the need for consumers residing near state borders to cross into neighboring states solely to purchase fuel, thereby nullifying the impact of fluctuating Value Added Tax rates. This reform would not only benefit customers but also prove advantageous for dealers located near these borders.

    Elucidating this standpoint, K. P. Murali, the President of the Tamil Nadu Petroleum Dealers Association, underscores the practicality of uniform taxes. Murali emphasizes that the existing divergent tax rates create price disparities, making it inconvenient for consumers. Furthermore, the disparities can potentially hinder dealers’ operations, particularly those in close proximity to state borders.

    Another persistent demand from these dealers is the enhancement of their profit margins. The Apoorva Chandra Committee’s 2016 report stressed that dealers need to sell 170 kilo litres per month to merely break even. This threshold would enable them to earn a remuneration of ₹27,500 monthly, coupled with an additional 5 paise per litre on diesel and 7 paise per litre on petrol, which translates to approximately ₹6,377 each month.

    However, the practicality of this margin is disputed. Dealers contend that the operating cost of 34 paise per litre allotted to them fails to cover essential expenses such as internet charges, local government taxes, point of sale machine expenditures, fire fighting equipment, and other incidentals. This shortfall in support is particularly evident for dealers who transact lower volumes, with some reporting sales below 110 kilo litres per month.

    A dealer with limited volume sales illustrates the challenge he faces. Despite the Apoorva Chandra Committee’s periodic recommendations to increase margins, he laments that his profit margin remains stagnant. The proliferation of retail outlets, numbering around 86,000 across India, has intensified competition. The situation is exacerbated by the establishment of new outlets in close proximity to his own. In light of these difficulties, he remains skeptical about the prospects of his business flourishing.

    Tamil Nadu alone houses approximately 6,500 retail outlets that distribute fuel supplied by state-run oil marketing companies. The plight of these dealers reflects broader industry dynamics, underscoring the urgency for reforms that would not only ensure dealers’ viability but also benefit consumers by simplifying the fuel purchase process.

  • Mera Bill Mera Adhikar App — Customers Get Incentives, Reporting Supply without Invoice

    Get ready to seize a remarkable opportunity! Commencing on September 1, the government / GST Council is gearing up to unveil the ‘Mera Bill Mera Adhikar’ incentive scheme, designed to encourage patrons to demand invoices for their purchases. Through this initiative, consumers are presented with an enticing chance to pocket cash rewards varying from Rs 10,000 to a whopping Rs 1 crore. These attractive prizes will be distributed through monthly and quarterly draws.

    Pioneered by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), this pioneering endeavor will make its debut across six States and Union Territories: Assam, Gujarat, Haryana, Puducherry, Daman & Diu, and Dadra & Nagar Haveli.

    Beyond the allure of potential rewards, this scheme endeavors to foster a culture of responsible consumption. By offering individuals incentives to demand legitimate invoices, this initiative takes a significant step towards curtailing tax evasion, nurturing accountability, and bolstering the formal economy’s expansion. In line with the government’s aspirations to refine GST procedures and enhance revenue collection, this digitally-driven campaign is in perfect alignment.

    Curious about how to take part in the ‘Mera Bill Mera Adhikar’ initiative? The process is simple. Individuals need to upload invoices issued by suppliers registered under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on the dedicated ‘Mera Bill Mera Adhikar’ mobile application. Remember, for eligibility in the lucky draw, the minimum value of the invoice should be Rs 200. Additionally, participants can upload a maximum of 25 invoices per month. The user-friendly app will be accessible on both iOS and Android platforms, ensuring easy participation for all users. The invoices you upload should encompass essential details such as the seller’s GSTIN, invoice number, payment amount, and tax particulars. Don’t miss out on this chance to both potentially win big and contribute to a more transparent and accountable economy.

  • Power of GST Officers

    GST Officers’ Authorities

    Understanding the authority of GST officers is crucial for every GST taxpayer. This awareness empowers them to approach the appropriate officer effectively, ensuring they make the right contact at the right time. Moreover, this knowledge safeguards their valuable time from being wasted due to approaching an incorrect GST officer, which could potentially result in unauthorized actions by such officers. Additionally, it shields GST taxpayers from unwarranted investigations and assessments. By comprehending the extent of powers vested in officers under the GST Act, including the jurisdiction of tax authorities and their capabilities within the GST framework, as well as the anti-evasion department’s prerogatives and the authority of GST inspectors, taxpayers can navigate the system more adeptly.

    Legal Framework

    Parallel to how various laws vest distinctive powers in different officers, the GST legislation confers specific authority to officers within the GST realm. Section 5 of the CGST Act, 2017, empowers GST officers, allowing each officer to exercise authority, subject to the guidelines set forth by the board. Furthermore, the Commissioner holds the prerogative to delegate his authority to any subordinate officer. An important query arises: “What authority do SGST officers possess?” The answer is that all powers granted under the CGST Act are, mutatis mutandis, extended to SGST officers under the SGST Act, 2017. To delve into the specific authorities of officers operating within the GST framework, the following significant powers come to the forefront.

    Authority of Inspection

    GST authorities, officers not ranked below the position of Joint Commissioner, possess the competence to authorize capable officers for inspecting various business premises, including those of taxable individuals, transporters, business proprietors, warehouse operators, and other relevant parties. However, such inspections mandate written authorization from an officer of no lesser standing than the Joint Commissioner. While they retain the discretion to inspect the premises of any GST taxpayer at any given time, it is essential that this is carried out under the written consent of an officer not below the rank of a Joint Commissioner. These inspections encompass GST taxpayer’s business establishments, goods, supplies, and transportation means.

    Authority of Search and Seizure

    The ability to search for and seize items of relevance is vested in a GST officer of no lower standing than that of a Joint Commissioner. This officer is empowered to conduct searches and seizures when there exists a genuine belief that pertinent goods, documents, or information crucial to ongoing proceedings have been concealed or withheld, subsequent to an earnest effort to acquire such details. Furthermore, the authority may be delegated to a suitable officer to execute searches and seizures of said goods, documents, and information in any location. GST officers possess the prerogative to conduct searches and seizures of goods, documents, or information that hold significance for legal procedures. It is essential to emphasize that this action can solely be undertaken by an officer duly authorized by an officer of at least the Joint Commissioner’s rank.

    Power to Detain

    GST officers have the jurisdiction to apprehend individuals who defy the laws within their purview. In the event of a taxpayer committing an offense, these officers hold the authority to demand all pertinent documents and evidence related to goods and services, should such action be deemed necessary. If the Commissioner possesses reasonable grounds to suspect that a taxpayer has engaged in an actionable offense as outlined in the CGST Act, they retain the right to empower an appropriate officer to effect the arrest of the concerned individual. However, it is imperative that the apprehended person is promptly informed of the reasons behind their arrest and subsequently presented before a magistrate within a span of 24 hours from the time of arrest.

    Summoning Individuals and Gathering Evidence

    The commission holds the authority to empower any GST officer to summon individuals, whose presence is deemed vital, for providing testimony or presenting documents or any relevant items during proceedings or inquiries conducted by said officer in alignment with the objectives of this Act.

    Accessing Business Premises

    The GST officer, duly authorized by the Additional/Joint Commissioner of CGST, possesses the right to enter any business premises owned by a registered taxable entity. This authority is granted to GST officers to facilitate audits, examinations, and inspections aimed at safeguarding revenue interests. Accordingly, the GST officer is entitled to examine accounting records, computer systems, documents, software, and any other pertinent items that are present at such locations.

    Revising Authority

    The Chief Commissioner or Commissioner, whether initiated spontaneously or based on received information, retains the prerogative to scrutinize the records of any proceeding. If it is determined that any decision or order made under this Act by a subordinate officer contains errors, the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner can initiate an inquiry, and subsequently, modify or revise the decision or order. However, prior to taking such actions, affected taxpayers must be provided with an opportunity to present their case.

    Empowering Officers for Effective Law Enforcement

    Within the framework of implementing GST in India and curbing tax evasion, GST officers possess a range of authoritative tools. However, there have been instances of these powers being abused. This highlights the timeless adage that granting unchecked authority can lead to its corruption.

    Authority for Penalty Imposition

    Enshrined in the CGST Act of 2017, the designated officer can initiate penalty proceedings if it’s determined that an individual is liable for penalties not covered by Sections 62, 63, 64, 73, 74, 129, and 130 of the Act. Following a fair opportunity for the individual to present their case, the officer can proceed to levy the appropriate penalty.

    Empowered Data Collection

    In line with the administration of the Act, GST officers authorized by the Commissioner have the prerogative to gather essential data. In circumstances where deemed necessary, the authorized officer can request pertinent information from all concerned taxpayers, including details related to GST, such as GST returns. This mechanism ensures that the enforcement of GST remains effective and transparent.

    Listed below are several instances within the realm of GST that may necessitate the proactive exertion of authority by GST officers:

    1. Supplying goods and services without issuing an invoice.
    2. Deliberately misrepresenting the nature of a supply on an invoice to evade taxes.
    3. Generating invoices or bills for goods and services not supplied, with the intent of claiming Input Tax Credit (ITC) or refunds.
    4. Collecting tax amounts but neglecting to remit them to the appropriate governmental body, surpassing a 3-month duration from the payment’s due date.
    5. Utilizing Input Tax Credit even in the absence of actual receipt of goods and services, whether partially or entirely.

    These enumerated powers, collectively referred to as the Powers of GST Officers, represent pivotal facets outlined in the GST Act. In addition to these specific powers, GST officers are also endowed with more general powers as designated by proper authorities. It is paramount, however, that these powers be wielded judiciously by the officers in question.

  • Expert Advises Small Taxpayers to Stay Vigilant While Reviewing GST Demand Notices

    The recent decision of India’s Supreme Court to uphold the Patna High Court’s ruling, which rejected a writ petition filed by a taxpayer against a GST assessment order, carries significant implications. The impact of this ruling extends widely to entities such as Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), as well as individuals categorized as ‘small business persons’ and professionals.

    In the case of Vishwanath Traders, the ramifications of this decision are particularly pronounced. SMEs, MSMEs, small business operators, and professionals are directly affected, as they often resort to directly approaching the high courts seeking recourse against demand notices due to delays in initiating appeals.

    According to Sunil Gabhawalla, a founding partner of a CA firm, the response (appeal) to a demand notice should be promptly made within three months. If there is any delay, individuals can seek an extension of one month by reaching out to the jurisdictional appellate commissioner. Beyond a period of four months, the only available option is to file a writ petition with the high courts.

    It’s worth noting that many small taxpayers fail to monitor the issuance of assessment orders, which may carry substantial financial demands and are conveyed through the GST portal. Consequently, these individuals often realize the demand well after the four-month window has lapsed.

    Manish Gadia, a partner at GMJ & Co, a chartered accountancy firm, highlighted that the process of delivering notices via the common portal began in the financial year 2020-21. Unfortunately, small taxpayers lack the capacity to consistently check the portal, leading to an accumulation of unnoticed notices and demands. Adding to the predicament, in recent months, bank accounts have been subjected to attachment due to non-payment, further alerting small taxpayers to these notices.

    The challenge intensifies as the apex court supports the stance of the High Court in refraining from entertaining writ petitions on this matter. While this interpretation holds legal merit, the Supreme Court’s decision essentially closes off a crucial avenue for these taxpayers, as emphasized by Gabhawalla. With the possibility of filing a writ petition off the table, affected parties will be required to settle the entire sum. Frequently, these tax demands are inflated, accompanied by substantial penalties, and mandatory interest.

    Tax experts suggest that SMEs must be vigilant in regularly checking for demand notices. There’s also a call for the government to contemplate amending the legislation to allow for delayed appeals in genuine cases involving SMEs and small taxpayers, as reported by TOI.

    (Note: This revised version offers a more straightforward and active voice while conveying the essential information and implications of the Supreme Court’s decision on SMEs and taxpayers.)

  • GST For Freelancers In India

    Are you engaged in freelancing? Are you wondering about the necessity of GST registration for freelancers? Worry not, for we are here to provide assistance. In this article, we will delve into the key aspects of GST registration, its benefits, and the payment conditions relevant to freelancers.

    Who is required to undergo GST registration in India?

    GST registration might appear to involve a substantial effort. However, it’s important to note that it is not obligatory for everyone. Let’s shed light on the situations that demand GST registration:

    • If your business achieves a turnover exceeding Rs. 20 lakhs within a fiscal year, consider regular category states.
    • For individuals residing in special category states, the turnover limit is Rs. 10 lakhs.
    • If you receive payments for services categorized under OIDAR (Online Information and Database Access and Retrieval). This encompasses activities like internet advertising, cloud-based services, and intangible items such as e-books, digital entertainment (music, movies, online gaming), software, and other electronic data like video lessons.

    Significance of GST for Freelancers and its Benefits

    Given that the Goods and Services Tax (GST) functions as an indirect tax on the provision of goods and services in India, Indian freelancers are also liable to pay GST when their turnover surpasses Rs. 20 lakhs during a fiscal year.

    As freelancers, you do not experience unique advantages by registering for GST. The benefits linked with GST registration remain uniform for all. In this new GST framework, you have the convenience of filing tax returns online. The process involves creating an account on the GST Portal, logging in, and initiating the filing of your GST returns.

    A central benefit of registration lies in your ability to claim GST credit. This credit can be employed to offset future GST obligations, and you can also pursue a GST refund (subject to specific conditions). For instance, if your firm conducts advertising activities on platforms like Google to attract new clients, you are obligated to remit 18% of the total amount as GST.

    Essential Documents for GST Registration

    For the purpose of GST registration, the following documents are necessary:

    • Your photograph
    • Copies of your PAN and Aadhaar card
    • Proof of identification and residence
    • Recent bank account statement or a canceled check
    • Your digital signature
    • Utility bills such as electricity or telephone bill
    • Office lease agreement
    • No objection certificate

    Post GST Registration Procedures

    Upon submitting all required documents and completing the necessary formalities, adherence to the legal process is crucial. While issuing invoices, the GST amount must be included in the total billed amount. For instance, if your invoiced sum for a client is Rs. 25,000, after adding 18% GST, the total payable amount becomes Rs. 29,500.

    Upon collecting GST, it’s imperative to remit the collected amount to the government while filing GST returns.

    Payment Terms and Conditions for GST-Registered Freelancers

    Several terms and conditions concerning payments are pertinent to GST-registered freelancers:

    • GST rates for your services can vary from 0%, 5%, 12%, 18%, to 28%, based on the nature of your service. In the absence of a specified rate, a GST rate of 18% should be charged to your clients.
    • Following the receipt of your GST identification number, regular GST filing (both monthly and yearly) is mandatory, irrespective of your current annual turnover.
    • All payments must be conducted online. This necessitates filing 37 returns annually: three monthly filings and one annual return.
    • Delays in depositing GST proceeds might result in fines.
    • To ensure timely GST deposit, issuing invoices on the 1st of the subsequent month is advisable. This offers ample time to settle your monthly GST liability.
    • After fulfilling all applicable tax obligations, submission of a monthly summary return under GSTR 3B is required.

    GST Registration and Invoicing for Freelancers

    If you operate as a freelancer, your clients anticipate receiving invoices from you. While submitting an invoice, your client might deduct 10% Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) from each invoice.

    If your earnings fall below Rs. 20 lakhs (or Rs. 10 lakhs in special category states), GST registration is not compulsory even if you issue invoices.

    Freelancers registered under GST are required to adhere to the latest GST regulations set forth by the government.

    Invoices must include your name, address, GSTIN for freelancers, your client’s GSTIN, Service Accounting Codes (SAC), date, amount, and signature.

    In Conclusion

    Considering that your PAN and Aadhaar are linked to all your financial transactions, opting for GST registration is a prudent choice. While GST filing may seem daunting for many freelancers, engaging a chartered accountant (CA) with experience in freelancing and sole proprietorship will ensure compliance with the most current laws in effect.